Action, protest, campaigns, demos and issues magazine features, photos, articles, stories photos of London, New York, Wales, England and photography features music, parties, clubs, events, records, releases drug information, harm reduction, no-nonsense guide punch a celebrity football, features, issues, cardiff city games, useless games and diversions technical info, web authoring, reviews and features site news, updates and urban75 blog urban75 community news and events urban75 bulletin boards join the chatroom search urban75 back to urban75 homepage
London features, photos, history, articles New York features, photos, history, articles Brixton features, photos, history, articles panoramas, 360 degree vistas, London, New York, Wales, England Offline London club night festival reports, photos, features and articles urban75 sitemap and page listing about us, info, FAQs, copyright join our mailing list for updates and news contact urban75
Group test of WYSIWYG web editors, with reviews of Adobe GoLive, Macromedia Dreamweaver MX 2004, NetObjects Fusion 7.5, Microsoft FrontPage 2003 and AceHTML 5
Group test of WYSIWYG web editors

BRIEFLY: The winners and the losers in our group test

» intro
» Pros and cons
» Adobe GoLive
» FrontPage 2003
» NetObjects 7.5
» AceHTML 5
» Dreamweaver MX
» Conclusion
» Other options

« tech homepage

urban75 WYSIWYG web editors group test WYSIWYG Web Editors: Conclusion
Our verdict
Mike Slocombe for Internet Magazine, May 2004

WYSIWYG editors have helped make life considerably easier for web authors struggling to keep up with ever-changing technologies, and it's good to see that all of the WYSIWYG editors on this test proved themselves capable of outputting solid, standards-compliant code.

But as the WYSIWYG editors try to cover more and more ground, the interfaces inevitably become more complex - and balancing ease of use with hugely expanded feature sets can prove a tricky compromise.

Screengrab of Macromedia Dreamweaver MX 2004 WYSIWYG web editor Although WYSIWYG editors provide the means to build compelling websites straight out of the box, inexperienced users without any hands-on experience of HTML may soon become unstuck when problems arise.

That's why it's important to stress that a good grounding in HTML and CSS - at the very least - is still essential for any serious web author, regardless of whether they're knocking sites out in FrontPage or Notepad.

Moreover, anyone looking for a career in web design will be expected to know their way around the HTML block too, because if you understand the code that makes up the page, you can find and fix problems quicker.


It's very tempting to go with the template flow, especially when they're as attractive as the ones provided with Net Objects Fusion, but if you're looking to create an original site, it's important to break away from the mould.

Almost all of the WYSIWYG editors in this test give you access to the raw code, and it's worth experimenting with this code to create a more individual identity. After all, it's important that your site reflects the originality and character of you or your company!

Adobe's GoLive CS is a much-improved product, and an excellent choice for anyone working in an Adobe print-based environment.

Although FrontPage can't match GoLive CS or Dreamweaver for power or features, crucially it undercuts them both by a considerable margin. This may prove persuasive to authors on a tight budget who don't need all the high-end bells and whistles.


Net Objects Fusion is the odd one out in so much as it's positively determined to shield authors from any HTML. For small businesses keen to set up shop online with no fuss, it's a bargain, but creatives and HTML gurus may be driven mad by the lack of access to the code.

Of all the WYSIWYG editors on test, Dreamweaver served up the most powerful and seductive combination of features and usability on offer, and it's no surprise that it's emerged as the leader in this group test.

But those features come at a hefty price, which is way out of the reach of many home users.

We threw in AceHTML to remind you that it's not the software that builds the site - it's the author.

Spend a little time learning HTML and there's no reason why you can't knock out a site to rival anything produced by the more expensive programs above.

So if you're budget's too tight to mention, that doesn't mean you can't compete with the rest.

You'll just have to do it a bit slower, that's all!

urban75 - community - action - mag - photos - tech - music - drugs - punch - football - offline club - brixton - london - new york - useless - boards - help/FAQs - © - design - contact - sitemap - search